Castuner

Litigator Libations

Trevor Ward, Jordan Grande, and John Fredericks

Updates and tips on defensive litigation in military justice including discussing recent appellate decisions and providing advocacy tips.

Site du podcast

Écouter dans votre application

Épisodes

116 épisodes

  1. 116 - The Tipsy Coachmen's Halloween Special 42:15
  2. 115 - You Have the Right to an Attorney (Sometimes) 33:34
  3. 114 - Season Six is Here! 33:17
  4. 113 - Season Finale: Chatrie and Bass 27:20
  5. 112 - Big SCOTUS Cases and Even Bigger Guest Star 44:32
  6. 111 - Ya Win Some, Ya Lose Some (RosarioMartinez & Galvin) 36:03
  7. 110 - The "Bad Faith" Exception (Johnson) 36:18
  8. 109 - Prior Consistent Cocktails, I Mean Statements (Brown) 34:32
  9. 108 - Devilish Dates: Panel Randomization and Kershaw 38:08
  10. 107 - Res Gestae for Sexual Assault Cases & Post Trial Motions 32:35
  11. 106 - A Whole Lot of “Chutzpah” 30:44
  12. 105 - Sex Dolls & Rights Invocations (Rocha IV and Hurtado) 35:58
  13. 104 - Nothing New Here... 33:45
  14. 103 - Improper Argument Strikes Again 45:28
  15. 102 - Get it Together, for Efficiency's Sake! 36:38
  16. 101 - "Moore" Clarification/Confusion on Mendoza 36:14
  17. It’s our 100th Episode! 20:16
  18. To Be, or Not to Be (Arbitrary)? 48:14
  19. 98 - Waiving Goodbye to Errors - and 2025! 41:39
  20. 97 - Alcohol and Bad Decisions (Ruiz and Gonzalez) 33:41
  21. 96 - Did Downum Change the Permissive Inference? 28:12
  22. 95 - Discovery Considerations following Roan and Secord 30:39
  23. 94 - How U.S. v. Casillas Clarifies (or Confuses) U.S. v. Mendoza. 32:36
  24. 93 - U.S. v. Saul; U.S. v. Navarro-Aguirre; and U.S. v. George 28:53
  25. 92 - US v Patterson; US v Dillenburger; and Reverse 404(b) 40:54
  26. 91 - US v Johnson; US v. Thomas; and Objecting to the Permissive Inference 25:12
  27. 90 - U.S. v. Taylor; U.S. v. Harborth; and Considering "or" in Specifications 46:26
  28. 89 - United States v. Brinkman-Coronel and MRE 513 and Family Advocacy Records 26:05
  29. 88 - United States v. Hunt and M.R.E. 105 33:54
  30. 87 - United States v. Shafran and Sexual Harassment as Free Speech 37:37
  31. 86 - United States v. Caswell and Public Trials 33:20
  32. 85 - United States v. Urieta, United States v. Valentin-Andino, & Prior Statements 29:22
  33. 84 - United States v. Greene-Watson and the Marital Privileges 38:50
  34. 83 - Free Speech Law in Military Justice & Your Client's Online Presence 41:20
  35. 82 - United States v. Campos and MRE 404(b) regarding Charged Conduct 23:36
  36. 81 - United States v. Davis and Victims at Motion Hearings 35:45
  37. 80 - United States v. Shelby; Firearm Prohibitions; and Meaningful Mitigation 31:00
  38. 79 - United States v. Rocha and Updates from the 2025 NDAA and EO 14130 42:46
  39. 78 - United States v Doroteo (AFCCA) and Sex Offender Registration as Mitigation 37:34
  40. 77 - United States v. Wells and Child Witnesses 41:09
  41. 76 - United States v. Hirst and the Novel Offenses Doctrine 30:38
  42. 75 - United States v. Guihama and Character Evidence 27:22
  43. 74 - United States v. Flanner and Preparing the Client 33:20
  44. 73 - United States v. Smith and Objecting to Arguments in a Judge Alone Forum 39:35
  45. 72 - United States v. Mendoza and Member Instructions 33:27
  46. 71 - United States v. Strong and Undue Influence 27:41
  47. 70 - H.V.Z v. United States and Lt Col Ghiotto on Hearsay 42:49
  48. 69 - United States v. Grijalva (Preemption Doctrine & First Amendment Issues) 33:43
  49. 68 - Diaz v. United States and R.C.M. 913(c) (Viewings and Inspections) 43:58
  50. 67 - US v Keago, US v Metz, Smith v Arizona, and US v. Rahimi 41:08